Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 63: 103863, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1931042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receive immunomodulatory treatments which can influence their ability to maintain vaccine specific serological response overtime. MS patients treated with cladribine tablets developed a positive serology response following two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. However, there is only limited data regarding the effect of cladribine tablets on long-term humoral response after the second and the third booster. METHODS: Serology response to SARS-CoV-2 was tested in healthy controls (HCs) and MS patients treated with cladribine tablets 6 and 9-12 months after the second dose, and 1 and 3-6 months following the third booster-dose of the BTN162b2 mRNA vaccine. RESULTS: Thirty-five out of 36 MS patients treated with cladribine tablets and 100% (46/46) of HCs had a positive serology response up to 10 months after the second vaccine dose. In addition, all cladribine tablets -treated MS patients (22/22) and HCs (24/24) had a positive robust serology response following the third vaccine with a positive humoral response sustain up to 6 months. One month after the third vaccine dose IgG levels were significantly lower in patients treated with cladribine tablets compared to HCs (15,598+11,313 vs 26,394+11,335, p<0.01). Six-month post second vaccine and 3-6 months post third vaccine there was no difference in IgG levels between the groups (1088.0 ± 1072.0 vs 1153.0 ± 997.1, p = 0.79; 5234+4097 vs 11,198+14,679, p = 0.4). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: MS patients treated with cladribine tablets have sustained positive vaccine specific serology response following the second and third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cladribine/adverse effects , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Tablets , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
2.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 57: 103343, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1474909

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are treated with immunomodulatory treatments that can influence their ability to develop a protective antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Vaccine efficacy is important for treatment decision and for patients' reassurance. The main objective is to assess antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in MS patients treated with cladribine. METHODS: Serology response was tested in 97 participants, 67 MS patients and 30 healthy controls (HCs), using two independent methods, 2-3 weeks following the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. RESULTS: HCs (n = 30) and MS patients treated with cladribine (n = 32) had 100% positive serology response against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein following the second vaccine dose (mean S1/S2-IgG and RBD-IgG:284.5 ± 104.9, 13,041±9411 AU/mL and 226.3 ± 121.4, 10,554±11,405 AU/mL respectively). Comparable findings were observed for untreated MS patients, and interferon beta-1a-treated MS patients (mean S1/S2-IgG: 282.1 ± 100.1, 276.9 ± 94.31 AU/mL respectively). No correlation was found between lymphocyte counts, treatment duration, or time between cladribine dose and vaccination, and serology response or antibody titers. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Cladribine treated MS patients are able to produce antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is reassuring and important for both patients and physicians and will allow to develop consensus guidelines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cladribine , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
3.
JAMA Neurol ; 78(12): 1510-1514, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1432341

ABSTRACT

Importance: B-cell-depleting therapies may affect the development of a protective immune response following vaccination. Understanding the ability to develop vaccine-specific immunity to COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with B-cell-depleting therapy is of importance for clinical decisions. Objective: To assess SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-specific humoral and cellular responses in patients treated with ocrelizumab compared with healthy controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center study performed at Hadassah Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel, included patients with MS treated with ocrelizumab, healthy controls, and untreated patients with MS. Vaccination occurred between December 2020 and April 2021. Participants donated blood 2 to 4 and 2 to 8 weeks after the second vaccine dose for antibody and T-cell assessments, respectively. Exposures: All participants received 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech) and completed the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of patients treated with ocrelizumab with SARS-CoV-2-specific serology and/or T-cell responses following vaccination. All participants underwent SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing; 29 patients treated with ocrelizumab and 15 healthy controls had evaluation of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses. Results: Of 112 participants, 49 (43.8%) had MS and were treated with ocrelizumab (33 [67.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 47.9 [13.3] years), 23 (20.5%) had MS and were not treated with disease-modifying therapies (18 [78.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 49 [13.4] years), and 40 (35.7%) were healthy controls (25 [62.5%] female; mean [SD] age, 45.3 [16] years). Twenty-six of 29 patients (89.7%) treated with ocrelizumab and 15 of 15 healthy controls (100%) had SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells following vaccination at similar levels (mean [SD], 15.4 [7.6] and 14.3 [6.3] spot-forming cells, respectively). Mean antibody titers and positive serology rate were lower in the group of patients treated with ocrelizumab (mean [SD] antibody titers and positive serology rate, 26.2 [49.2] and 376.5 [907.6] AU/mL; 10 of 40 [25%] and 20 of 49 [40.8%] for S1/S2 and receptor-binding domain, respectively) compared with healthy controls (mean [SD] antibody titers and positive serology rate, 283 [100] and 12 712 [9114] AU/mL; 100% S1/S2 and receptor-binding domain) and untreated patients (mean [SD] antibody titers and positive serology rate, 288.3 [113.8] and 10 877 [9476] AU/mL; 100% S1/S2 and receptor-binding domain), with positive association to time from ocrelizumab infusion (S1/S2: r = 0.7, P < .001; receptor-binding domain: r = 0.4, P = .04). Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, patients with MS who were treated with ocrelizumab generated comparable SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses with healthy controls and had lower antibody response following vaccination. Given the potential role of T cells in protection from severe disease, this is reassuring and will help physicians develop consensus guidelines regarding MS treatment in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy
4.
J Neurol Sci ; 417: 117053, 2020 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-665223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic presents two main concerns for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG); chronic immunosuppression may put them at greater risk, and some proposed treatments for COVID-19 could cause MG exacerbation. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present three patients with generalized seropositive MG who developed COVID-19. All patients had a favorable outcome, with only one patient experiencing exacerbation. In this case, exacerbation began before COVID-19; she required ICU admission, non-invasive ventilatory support, and received hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir and ritonavir which were well tolerated. One patient received IVIG in place of scheduled plasma exchange. CONCLUSION: Outcome was favorable in all cases despite immunosuppressive therapy, use of experimental COVID-19 medication and switching of plasma exchange for IVIG.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Myasthenia Gravis/complications , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Adult , Aged , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Hypertension/complications , Hypothyroidism/complications , Immunocompromised Host , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Male , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Plasmapheresis , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL